Page 9 of 9 FirstFirst ... 789
Results 201 to 223 of 223

Thread: Camera shake revisited

  1. #201
    Legend
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,344

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bertzie View Post
    I want one of those trains!
    That was the first thing that came to my mind. It took me back to my childhood. Although I only have one working model as a kid, I loved it more than anything.

    Not sure what he meant by painting the blocks black though? Wish you would had embellished the nuances of train a bit more Janke. I also loved the garden. Yes, I garden.

  2. #202
    Legend Janke's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    10,539

    Default

    The video was actually just a documentation, intended for another forum (livesteam.net), so the narration was directed to other train hobbyists.

    The patio stones closest to the street are painted with black (actually gray) masonry paint, to reduce the visibility of the track from the street. Vandals, you know - the less they notice, the less they destroy...

    For more train videos, just go to my FinnishLivesteam account on YouTube... a lot more "nuances" there, including this:



    On-topic content: Notice the camera shake in the shots; here, a simple stabilizer was used in many of the scenes...


  3. #203
    Legend Playing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    1,111

    Default

    Hi Janke, if you don't know it you will love: Keith Roberts' Pavane.

    It is an alternative history where the Pope banned the internal combustion engine. There is a wonderful story of a steam road train. The driver remembers how his father beat him because he forgot to drain water from the cylinder and the piston cracked it.
    There are also semaphores because the Pope forbids electric communication.

    To stay on topic: This Pope would of course also ban optical image stabilizers.
    HFS21 l HF100 l DM100 l Zoom H1

  4. #204
    Tropical Legend cgbier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Saipan, USA
    Posts
    12,086

    Default

    Am I right in the assumption that you guys wouldn't like this nifty little plugin: http://www.fcp.co/media/kunena/attac...hakeEffect.zip ?
    "It is dark the other side. Very dark!" - "Oh, shut up and eat your toast!"

  5. #205
    Legend
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,344

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Playing View Post
    To stay on topic: This Pope would of course also ban optical image stabilizers.
    No idea what this is about but a good stabilizer is a must have these days. However, the optical stabilizer can only do so much. In additions, they're not all created equally.

    If the internal stabilization isn't sufficient, theres always the external variety which vary in price from 100-$1000 for the HVxx size cameras and the like.
    Quote Originally Posted by cgbier View Post
    Am I right in the assumption that you guys wouldn't like this nifty little plugin: http://www.fcp.co/media/kunena/attac...hakeEffect.zip ?
    If thats a shake/stabilizer software they are also available on most NLE editors.

  6. #206
    Legend Almohada's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    California
    Posts
    5,630

    Default

    Damn it Janke! That video and its related videos kept me up all night watching steam train videos
    Vice President, Team HVFF - http://hvfffollowfocus.webs.com/ HV Follow Focus
    Proud owner CamDolly - Modular Camera Dolly and Slider System

  7. #207
    Tropical Legend cgbier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Saipan, USA
    Posts
    12,086

    Default

    Nope, Krane this is a camera shake simulator. It adds shake to your footage.
    "It is dark the other side. Very dark!" - "Oh, shut up and eat your toast!"

  8. #208
    Legend Almohada's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    California
    Posts
    5,630

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cgbier View Post
    Nope, Krane this is a camera shake simulator. It adds shake to your footage.
    Kamera Krane? Kranes are stabilized..
    Vice President, Team HVFF - http://hvfffollowfocus.webs.com/ HV Follow Focus
    Proud owner CamDolly - Modular Camera Dolly and Slider System

  9. #209
    Legend Playing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    1,111

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Krane View Post
    If the internal stabilization isn't sufficient, theres always the external variety which vary in price from 100-$1000 for the HVxx size cameras and the like.
    I made myself a very nice one for free: To film from the vibrating car I put a big cinder-block in an old backpack, hung it from the passenger seat and clamped the camera to it. I still had to strap the top of the passengers seat to the back to stop it moving but it worked very well. It was amazing how many people noticed and waved.

    When someone else was driving a tripod with two legs on my feet and one on the seat also worked well.
    HFS21 l HF100 l DM100 l Zoom H1

  10. #210
    Legend
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,344

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Almohada View Post
    Kamera Krane? Kranes are stabilized..
    Saw through me did ya? Well aren't you the clever thing.

  11. #211
    Legend
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,344

    Default

    Yet another example of annoying camera shake: So the other day I go youtube figuring I'd watch a few review videos on the Canon Xl105 (one of two cameras I've narrowed down to purchase). Not a few seconds into the review as I'm trying to look at the camera and the idiot camera operator started swaying back and forth. If that wasn't bad enough, the bird brain then figured he'd throw in those stupid repeated snap zooms for good measure. Swosh! right up to the speakers face.

    Where on earth did all this retarded camera antics come from? It was like trying to watch a product from a roller coaster. This happy horse nonsense is driving me crazy? Since when do you need to add shake to a hand held shot? Anyway, I wanted to strangle that camera operator.

    End rant.

    What say you?

    Quote Originally Posted by cgbier View Post
    Nope, Krane this is a camera shake simulator. It adds shake to your footage.
    Must have been this camera operator I'm talking about?
    Last edited by Krane; 2012 June 20th at 17:37.

  12. #212
    Tropical Legend cgbier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Saipan, USA
    Posts
    12,086

    Default

    Krane, there some XF footage shot handheld from a motorbike. I linked it somewhere in an XF thread. Check it out.

    I'm not sure why you want to spend the extra dough for the 105, but this little cam is mightily amazing.
    "It is dark the other side. Very dark!" - "Oh, shut up and eat your toast!"

  13. #213
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Ilkeston, Derbyshire, UK
    Posts
    425

    Default

    My two cents (sorry if this has been said before, just coming in now) -

    I like a bit of camera shake. I find overuse of sliders and dollys and clean smooth shots makes any video look corporate and thus unaesthetic and unpleasing to my eyes. There's something beautiful about the rawness of film. Tripod yes from time to time, sliders as seldom as possible!
    Facebook me http://www.facebook.com/GeorgeEdMaier - Twitter me @GeorgeMaier - Stalk me!

  14. #214
    Legend Almohada's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    California
    Posts
    5,630

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GeorgeMaier View Post
    There's something beautiful about the rawness of film.

    Vice President, Team HVFF - http://hvfffollowfocus.webs.com/ HV Follow Focus
    Proud owner CamDolly - Modular Camera Dolly and Slider System

  15. #215
    Legend
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,344

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GeorgeMaier View Post
    My two cents (sorry if this has been said before, just coming in now) -

    I like a bit of camera shake. I find overuse of sliders and dollys and clean smooth shots makes any video look corporate and thus unaesthetic and unpleasing to my eyes. There's something beautiful about the rawness of film. Tripod yes from time to time, sliders as seldom as possible!
    Sorry but no. And if Garrett Brown read this he would be convulsing as I am now. And unless its adding something to the intensity of the story, a shaking camera is the clearer sign of an amateur.
    Quote Originally Posted by cgbier View Post

    I'm not sure why you want to spend the extra dough for the 105, but this little cam is mightily amazing.
    Enhanced flexibility. And in future anticipation of expanding my work into 3D.
    Last edited by Krane; 2012 June 20th at 19:42.

  16. #216
    Legend Janke's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    10,539

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GeorgeMaier View Post
    There's something beautiful about the rawness of film.
    Film has nothing to do with camera shake.

    Film was the silver-gelatin-emulsion-coated, cellulose-based long strip (usually 35mm or 16mm wide) once used for producing moving pictures.


  17. #217
    Legend
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Thailand
    Posts
    4,404

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GeorgeMaier View Post
    sliders as seldom as possible!
    sliders1_medium.jpg

    I'm with you there - they suck!

  18. #218
    Legend Almohada's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    California
    Posts
    5,630

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Janke View Post
    once used for producing moving pictures.
    still being used and will continue to be used!
    Vice President, Team HVFF - http://hvfffollowfocus.webs.com/ HV Follow Focus
    Proud owner CamDolly - Modular Camera Dolly and Slider System

  19. #219
    Legend Almohada's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    California
    Posts
    5,630

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Benway View Post
    I'm with you there - they suck!
    Only because they are OVERUSED especially nowadays they are synonymous with DSLRs.... non stop sliding movement. So annoying!!!!! READ a film BOOK people! It's called a dolly or tracking shot. It was not meant to be used 99.5% of the time.
    Vice President, Team HVFF - http://hvfffollowfocus.webs.com/ HV Follow Focus
    Proud owner CamDolly - Modular Camera Dolly and Slider System

  20. #220
    Legend Playing's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Cape Town
    Posts
    1,111

    Default

    I can think of one single example where camera shake is expected: If you are inside a car/truck and it goes over a bump.
    Directors please note: This does not apply to spacecraft!
    Last edited by Playing; 2012 June 21st at 04:42.
    HFS21 l HF100 l DM100 l Zoom H1

  21. #221
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Ilkeston, Derbyshire, UK
    Posts
    425

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Janke View Post
    Film has nothing to do with camera shake.
    What I meant was film both digital and actual film in contrast with commercial videos ect.. And this rawness is amplified and made more significant with a bit of shaking here and there. And I like rawness.
    Facebook me http://www.facebook.com/GeorgeEdMaier - Twitter me @GeorgeMaier - Stalk me!

  22. #222
    Legend Janke's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Helsinki, Finland
    Posts
    10,539

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Almohada View Post
    still being used and will continue to be used!
    Not by me, anymore.

    Of the film stock manufacturers, Agfa went bankrupt, Kodak is in trouble, Fuji... well, we'll see.

    Nobody is running steam locomotives anymore, either (nobody sane, I mean... )



  23. #223
    Legend
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    1,344

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Janke View Post
    Not by me, anymore.

    Of the film stock manufacturers, Agfa went bankrupt, Kodak is in trouble, Fuji... well, we'll see.

    Nobody is running steam locomotives anymore, either (nobody sane, I mean... )
    This wouldn't be the first time the end of film was foretold. The invention of video tape way back in the 50's was suppose to do that.


    (Yes, I've said all this has been said before but Janke started it)
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr. Benway View Post
    sliders1_medium.jpg

    I'm with you there - they suck!
    The show had great potential, just not very good writers. If it was a sci-fi made, I've seen it.
    Last edited by Krane; 2012 June 21st at 16:03.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •